Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Salah Laku Pelajar-Pelajar Menengah Atas di Daerah Manjung

Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Salah Laku Pelajar-Pelajar Menengah Atas di Daerah Manjung

The purpose of this study was to observe the factors which influenced the misconduct of students in the upper secondary schools in the Manjung district. This research based on Wickman model (1974) which stressed on moral misbehaviour, against the authority (teacher), the school rules, classroom rule...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Mhod Shubari, L. Mat
التنسيق: أطروحة
اللغة:eng
eng
منشور في: 2000
الموضوعات:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://etd.uum.edu.my/638/1/MHOD_SHUBARI_L._MAT_-_Faktor-Faktor_Yang_Mempengaruhi_Salah_Laku_Pelajar_Menengah_Atas_Di_Daerah_Manjung.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/638/2/1.MHOD_SHUBARI_L._MAT_-_Faktor-Faktor_Yang_Mempengaruhi_Salah_Laku_Pelajar_Menengah_Atas_Di_Daerah_Manjung.pdf
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
id my-uum-etd.638
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Mhod Shubari, L. Mat
Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Salah Laku Pelajar-Pelajar Menengah Atas di Daerah Manjung
description The purpose of this study was to observe the factors which influenced the misconduct of students in the upper secondary schools in the Manjung district. This research based on Wickman model (1974) which stressed on moral misbehaviour, against the authority (teacher), the school rules, classroom rules, do not comply with the school home work, lack of cooperation and self tidyness. The misconduct factor was based on demography (sex, race, family size, family’s income and parents education status), family relationship, learning environment and school physical facilities and peer group influence. The research was conducted with 350 respondences from seven schools in Manjung Perak. From which only 295 questionaires were returned and analysed. The questionaires consist of 63 items using Likert Scale. The required data were analysed through descriptive statistic for its frequency, percent, min and standard deviation. Inferences statistic method for t-test analysis, ANOVA, Pearson corellation and regression are used to test the hypothesis. The research showed that no significant differences among the demography factor, that is sex, race, family income, family size and the education status of the mother with misconduct except factors of number of siblings and education status of the father. The results of the research also show factors of family relationship, school physical facilities, the learning environment and peer group influenced the misconduct of the students. However the learning environment factor and peer group has a little stronger relationship and significant influence toward misconduct behaviour among the upper secondary school students.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Mhod Shubari, L. Mat
author_facet Mhod Shubari, L. Mat
author_sort Mhod Shubari, L. Mat
title Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Salah Laku Pelajar-Pelajar Menengah Atas di Daerah Manjung
title_short Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Salah Laku Pelajar-Pelajar Menengah Atas di Daerah Manjung
title_full Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Salah Laku Pelajar-Pelajar Menengah Atas di Daerah Manjung
title_fullStr Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Salah Laku Pelajar-Pelajar Menengah Atas di Daerah Manjung
title_full_unstemmed Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Salah Laku Pelajar-Pelajar Menengah Atas di Daerah Manjung
title_sort faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi salah laku pelajar-pelajar menengah atas di daerah manjung
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Sekolah Siswazah
publishDate 2000
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/638/1/MHOD_SHUBARI_L._MAT_-_Faktor-Faktor_Yang_Mempengaruhi_Salah_Laku_Pelajar_Menengah_Atas_Di_Daerah_Manjung.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/638/2/1.MHOD_SHUBARI_L._MAT_-_Faktor-Faktor_Yang_Mempengaruhi_Salah_Laku_Pelajar_Menengah_Atas_Di_Daerah_Manjung.pdf
_version_ 1747826962386124800
spelling my-uum-etd.6382022-06-07T03:59:44Z Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Salah Laku Pelajar-Pelajar Menengah Atas di Daerah Manjung 2000-04-16 Mhod Shubari, L. Mat Sekolah Siswazah Graduate School LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The purpose of this study was to observe the factors which influenced the misconduct of students in the upper secondary schools in the Manjung district. This research based on Wickman model (1974) which stressed on moral misbehaviour, against the authority (teacher), the school rules, classroom rules, do not comply with the school home work, lack of cooperation and self tidyness. The misconduct factor was based on demography (sex, race, family size, family’s income and parents education status), family relationship, learning environment and school physical facilities and peer group influence. The research was conducted with 350 respondences from seven schools in Manjung Perak. From which only 295 questionaires were returned and analysed. The questionaires consist of 63 items using Likert Scale. The required data were analysed through descriptive statistic for its frequency, percent, min and standard deviation. Inferences statistic method for t-test analysis, ANOVA, Pearson corellation and regression are used to test the hypothesis. The research showed that no significant differences among the demography factor, that is sex, race, family income, family size and the education status of the mother with misconduct except factors of number of siblings and education status of the father. The results of the research also show factors of family relationship, school physical facilities, the learning environment and peer group influenced the misconduct of the students. However the learning environment factor and peer group has a little stronger relationship and significant influence toward misconduct behaviour among the upper secondary school students. 2000-04 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/638/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/638/1/MHOD_SHUBARI_L._MAT_-_Faktor-Faktor_Yang_Mempengaruhi_Salah_Laku_Pelajar_Menengah_Atas_Di_Daerah_Manjung.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/638/2/1.MHOD_SHUBARI_L._MAT_-_Faktor-Faktor_Yang_Mempengaruhi_Salah_Laku_Pelajar_Menengah_Atas_Di_Daerah_Manjung.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Ab. Alim Abdul Rahim (1988). Peerlanggaran Disiplin dan Peraturan Sekolah Di Kalangan Pelajar, Kajian Kes Di Dua Buah Sekolah Menengah Di Selangor Daru Ehsan, Latihan Ilmiah, Universiti Pertanian, Serdang. Atan Long, (1984). Pendidik dan Pendidikan, Petaling Jaya, Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Abdul Rahim Abdul Majid, (1996). Perak Nombor Satu. Aziz Bakar, (1977). Salah Laku Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Daerah Yan, Latihan Ilmiah, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Balson, Maurice (1992). Understanding Classroom Behaviour, The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd. Australia. Barkley, R. A. (1981). Hyperactive Children Guildford Press, New York. Bennett, N. dan Blundell, D. (1983). Quantity and Quality of Work In Rows and Classroom Groups, Educational Psychology, Vol 3: 93-105. Berita Harian, 11 Mac, 1997. Peningkatan Jenayah Pelajar Naik Mendadak. Berita Harian, 27 Mac, 1999. Pegawai Perhubungan Sekolah Kawal Samseng. Boyson, R. (1973). 'Order and Purpose' in B. Turner (ed), Disciplin In Schools, Ward Lock Educational, London. Brenda S. Griffin, Charles T. Griffin (1978). Juvenile Deliquency In Perspective, Harper & Row, London. Campbell, Roald F., Corbally John E. dan Nystrand, Raphael D. (1988). Pengenalan Pentadbiran Pendidikan, Terjemahan oleh Abdul Rahman Md. Aroff, Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pilhie dan Habibah Elias, 6th. ed. Universiti Pertanian Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. Charles, C. M. (1992). Building Classroom Discipline, 4th. ed. Longman, New York. Cohen, Stanley (1985). Visions of Social Control : Crime, Punishment and Classification, Policy Press, New York. Cohen, Yehudi A. (1961). Social Structure and Personality : A Casebook, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York. Cohen, Stewart, (1987). Growing Up With Children : An Introduction To Work With Young Children, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York. Cordell, A.S. dan Cannon, T.L. ( 1985). Gifted Kids Can't Always Spell, Academic Therapy, Vol 21: 143-153. Croker, R.K. dan Brooker, G.M. (1986). Classroom Control and Student Outcomes In Grades 2 and 5, American Educational Research Journal, Vol 23: 1-11. Davidson, Lanrie dan Gordon, Laura Kramer, (1979). The Sociology of Gender, Rand Mc Nally College, Chicago. Davidson, J. Kenneth, (1996). Marriage and Family : Change and Continity, Allen and Bacon, Boston. Davidson, S. Kenneth, (1986). The Preparation of Teachers : An Unstudied Problem in Education, Rev. ed. Brookline Books, Cambridge. Diprete, T. (1981). Disciplin and Order in America High School, Report To The National, Washington, DC, National Center for Education Statistics. Docking, J W. ( 1987). Control and Discipline in Schools, Harper and Row, London. Dunhill, J. (1965). Discipline in The Classroom, University Of London Press Ltd., London. Fatimah Hamid Don (1978). Disiplin Dalam Situasi Pembelajaran, Laporan Seminar Kebangsaan Negara, Kuala Lumpur. Felmlee, D. dan Eder, D. (1983). Contextual Effects In The Classroom : The Impact Ability Group On group Attention, Socialogy of Education, Vol 56: 77-87. Fontana, David (1994). Managing Classroom Behaviour, BPS Books, Leicester, UK. Garett , Short J.F. (1974). Social Class and deliquency : Prediction and Outcomes of Police Juvenile Encounters? Journal of Social Problems Vol. 22. Goldstein, Sam, (1995). Understanding and Managing Children's Classroom, John Wiley & Son Inc. Canada. Hallinan, M.T. (1983). Friend In School : Pattern Of Selection and Influence in Secondary Schools, Academic Press, New York. Hallinan, M.T. dan Sorensen A.B. (1985). Ability Grouping and Student Friendships, American Educational Research Journal Vol. 22: 485-499. Hallinan, M.T dan R.A. Williams (1990). Student's Characteristics and the Peer-Influence Process. Sociology of Education. Hargreaves, D.H.(1967). Social Relation In A Secondary School, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. Helton, G. B. dan Oakland, T. D. (1977). Teachers' Attitudinal Responses To Differing Characteristic of Elemenury School Students, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 69 : 261-265. Hetherington, E.M., K.A. Camara, and D.I. Featheman, (1981). Cognitive Performance, School Behaviour and Achievement of Children from One-Parent Households, Report prepared for the Families as Educators Team, National Institute of Education. Washington Dc., National Institute of Education. Hodges, V. (1968). Non-Attendence At School, Education Research, Vol. 12: 69-83. Hurlock, E.B. (1975). Developmental Psychology, Mc Graw Hill, New York. Jenkins, Patricia, H. (1995). School Delinquency And School Commitment, Journal Socialogy of Education, Vol. 68(3):221-236. Jessup, Michael, H. dan Kiley, Margrate, A. (1971). Discipline : Positive Attitudes For Learning, Prentice Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliff, New Jersey. Kelly, J.B. dan Wallerstein, (1979). Children Of Divorce, The National Elementary Principal. Levin, James, (1991). Principal Of Classroom Management, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Lewis, Ramon, (1991). The Discipline Dilemma. The Australian Council For Educational Research Ltd. Australia. Malek Murad, (1986). Krisis Disiplin Di Kalangan Penuntut Sekolah, Isu Pendidikan Di Malaysia, Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur. Masden, Charles H. and Masdan Clifford K. (1970). Teaching Disciplin, Allyn and Bacon Inc., Boston. Meng. E.A. (1994). Siri Pendidikan Pengurusan Sekolah dan Bilik Darjah, Fajar Bakti, Kuala Lumpur. Meyer, Carol H. (1976). Social Work Practice, 2nd. ed. Free Press, New York. Mohd Tajuddin Abdul Rahman, (1995). Masalah Disiplin dan Penyelesaiannya, Dewan Masyarakat, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur. Mohd. Majid Konting, (1994). Kaedah Pendidikan, edisi ke4, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur. Mok Soon Sang, (1998). Pendidikan Di Malaysia Untuk Diploma Pergurusan, Edisi ke 12, Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd., Kuala Lumpur Morrish, Ivor (1975). The Sociology of Education, An Introduction, George Allen and Unwin Ltd. London. Mueller, D. dan Cooper, P. (1986). Children Of Single-Parent Families : How They Fare As Young Adult, Family Relations Vol. 35: 169-176. Myers, David G. (1987). Social Psychology, 2nd ed. Mc Graw Hill, New York. Oakes, Jeannie (1986). Critical Perspective On The Organization and Improvement of Schooling, Kluver, Boston. Oakes, Jeannie dan Lipton, Martin (1999). Teaching To Charge The World, Mc Graw Hill College, Boston. Peter, M.H., Alexander J.W. dan Michael C. (1995). Coventional Wisdom Is A Poor Predictor Of The Relationship Between Discipline Policy, Students Misbehaviour and Teacher Stress, Journal of Education Psychology, Vol. 65 : 27-48. Purkey, S. dan Smith, M. (1983). Effective Schools : A Review, Elementery Schools Journal, Vol. 83. Rankin, Terry L., Cole, David J. dan Fetezer, James H. (1990). Philosophy, Mind and Cognitive Inquiry : Resources For Understanding Mental Process, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht. Raven, Bertram Herbert (1926). Social Psychologgy, 2nd. ed. Wiley, New York. Riley, D. dan Shaw, M. (1985). Parental Supervision and Juvenile Delinquency, HMSO, London. Rohaty Mohd Majzub, (1991). Disiplin Dalam Pendidikan, Nurin Enterprise, Kuala Lumpur. Rohaty Mohd Majzub, (1987). Permasalahan Disiplin Pelajar-Pelajar Remaja, Satu Dimensi Sosio-Psikologi, Suara Pendidik, Vol. 13 ha1 2 1-22. Ruhiyati Idayu, (1982). Ponteng Sekolah dan Permasalahannya, dalam Ibrahim Saad, Isu Pendidikan Di Malaysia, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur. Isu Pendidikan Di Malaysia, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur. Sekaran, Uma, (1992). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (2Ed.), John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York. Sharifah Alwiyah Alsagoff (1980). Sosiologi Pendidikan, Heiemann Education Books Ltd., Kuala Lumpur. Short, Paula, M. Short, Rick Jay, dan Blanton, (1994). Rethinking Student Disciplin, Corwin Press, California. Slee, Roger, (1995). Changing Theories and Practices of Discipline The Palmer Press, London. Smith, Richard, (1985). Freedom and Discipline, George Allen and Unwin Ltd. United Kingdom. Tennent, T.G. (1971). School Non Attendence and Delinquency, Educational Research, Vol 13. Turner, J. (1977). Psychology For The Classrom, Metheur Press, London. Tyerman, H.J. (1958). A Research Into Truancy, British Journal Of Educational Psychology, Vol 28. Varma, Vep, P. (1993). Management Of Behaviour In School, Longman Group, England. Waegel, B. William, (1989). Delinquency and Juvenile Control. A Sociological Perspective, Englewood Cliffs, Prewntice Hall. Wan Mohd. Zahid Mohd Nordin, (1994). Wawasan Pendidikan : Agenda Pengisian. Cahaya Pantai Publishing (M) Sdn. Bhd. Kuala Lumpur. West, D. J. Donald James, (1924). Delinquency : Its Roots, Carrers and Prospect, Heinemann, London. Whendall, K., Morris, M. Vaughan, P. dan Ng, Y.Y. (1981). Rows Versus Tables : An Exampel of The Use of Behavioural Ecology In Two Classes of Eleven Year Old Children, Educational Psychology, Vol 1 : 171 - 189. Whendall, K. dan Olds, D. (1987). Of Sex and Seating : The Effects of Mixed and Same-sex Seating Arrangements In Junior Classroom, New Zealand Journal of Educational Studise, Vol. 22: 71 -85. Wilson, P.S. (1971). Interest and Discipline in Education, Routledge and Kagan Paul, London. Winter, S. (1996). Teacher's Expectation Towards Disruptive Students In Hong Kong, Psychologia, Vol. 39: 102-108. Wittrock, M. C. (1986). Students' Thought Process, In M. C. Wittrock (ed.)Handbook of Research on Teaching, Macmillan, London. Wolmen, Benjamin, B. (1989). Dictionary of Behavioral Science, Academic Press Inc., New York. Yaakub Hj. Yusof, (1977). Perbandingan Mengenai Nilai-Nilai di Antara Ibu Bapa Murid-Murid Yang Ponteng Dan Tidak Ponteng, Latihan Ilmiah, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. Zikmund W.G. (1994). Business Research Method (4th. ed.), Dryden Press, London.

مواد مشابهة